Legal Opinion

Kelchner v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1912No. 17,504PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 1.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

In an appeal to the district court from an award of damages for the appropriation of land for park purposes under the provisions of section 1126 of the General Statutes of 1909, a bond was filed running to the park board instead of the city, the proper obligee. (Gen. Stat. 1909, §1130; Jus. Civ. Code, § 121.) A motion was filed to dismiss the appeal because an- undertaking or bond as required by law had not been filed. This motion was overruled, and the landowner was allowed to file an amended bond running to the city as obligee after the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Weyer v. Chicago, Wisconsin & Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Yellowstone Park Railroad v. Bridger Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. McKinney v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McClelland Bros. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. State v. HollisArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bailey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. State Ex Rel. McKelvey v. StynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. IrwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API