Legal Opinion · Dissent

California v. Ramos

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 6, 1983No. 81-1893Published

1DissentJustice Marshall, joined by Justice Brennan joins, and with whom Justice Blackmun joins as to Parts Ii, Iii, Iv, and V

Even if I accepted the prevailing view that the death penalty may constitutionally be imposed under certain circumstances, I could not agree that a State may tip the balance in favor of death by informing the jury that the defendant may eventually be released if he is not executed. In my view, the Briggs Instruction is unconstitutional for three reasons. It is misleading. It invites speculation and guesswork. And it injects into the capital sentencing process a factor that bears no relation to the nature of the offense or the character of the offender.

I

I continue to adhere to my view that the…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API