Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 2004No. 03-89057PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
366 F.3d 963
In re COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.
No. 03-89057.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 2004.
Before ALARCÓN,* KOZINSKI, KLEINFELD, A. TASHIMA, and W.A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and PATEL,** COUGHENOUR, EZRA, SHANSTROM, and LEVI,* District Judges.
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
1
This is a petition for review of the dismissal of a judicial misconduct complaint. The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit (Council) has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 352(c), and we deny the petition, albeit on a different ground than that relied on by the Chief Judge.
2
The complainant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Donald L. Meek v. County of Riverside, and Albert J. Wojcik, Judge, Riverside Municipal Court Rodney Walker, Judge, Riverside Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In the Matter of a Charge of Judicial Misconduct or DisabilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Samuel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019