Legal Opinion
Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n v. New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1972PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
Plaintiffs are corporations engaged under State license in the business of operating horse racetracks and conducting gambling operations by pari-mutuel systems of betting. In these four actions against the New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission, the New York State Racing Commission and other parties having an adverse interest in the controversy, plaintiffs seek judgment declaring chapters 143 and 144 of the Laws of 1970 unconstitutional and restraining official action under those chapters.
These enactments together constitute articles V and VI of the Pari-Mutuel Revenue Law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Hatch v. . ReardonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- MTR. OF JOSLIN v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Dalton v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Maybee v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.