Fetterly v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
PROLOGUE
Retroactive, or prospective only, application of a new rule of law, is the theme of this Court’s opinion in today’s offering, State v. Fetterly. It comes before the Court on appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying Fetterly’s attempt to obtain relief in a post-conviction action, otherwise known in the federal court system as a habeas corpus proceeding. The issues before us are rather simplistic, being basically pro and con as to whether a new rule of law will or will not apply to a convicted defendant whose status is yet pending on direct appeal, or, to equally extend that…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.