Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fetterly v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. 18966Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

PROLOGUE

Retroactive, or prospective only, application of a new rule of law, is the theme of this Court’s opinion in today’s offering, State v. Fetterly. It comes before the Court on appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying Fetterly’s attempt to obtain relief in a post-conviction action, otherwise known in the federal court system as a habeas corpus proceeding. The issues before us are rather simplistic, being basically pro and con as to whether a new rule of law will or will not apply to a convicted defendant whose status is yet pending on direct appeal, or, to equally extend that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API