Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Caught-On-Bleu, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 2, 2004No. 03-2549PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Caught-on-Bleu, Inc., manufacturer of a microbrew named Billy Budd Classic American Ale that was briefly distributed in New Hampshire during the fall of 1999, appeals summary judgments awarded to Anheuser-Busch, Inc., on AnheuserBusch’s claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition under the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127, and on Caught-on-Blue’s counterclaims under New Hampshire law for tortious interference with contractual rights and unfair competition. The rationale underlying the challenged judgments was explained in two meticulously reasoned opinions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Vargas-Ruiz v. Golden Arch Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Caught-On-Bleu, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ligotti v. GarofaloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Bear Republic Brewing Co. v. Central City Brewing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  3. Evans v. Taco BellDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Coldwell Banker Real Estate, LLC v. Brian Moses Realty, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Northeastern Lumber Manufacturers Assoc. v. Northern States Pallet Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API