Legal Opinion

Smith v. 167th Street & Walton Ave. Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

Plaintiff infant, by guardian, and the infant’s mother have had judgment in this negligence action against the three defendants, two of whom are insured. The policy in each instance is less in amount than the judgment. The insurers seek stay of execution and each has filed its sole undertaking without surety. Plaintiffs object. The purpose of section 568-a of the Civil Practice Act was to permit the insurer of a defendant, its insured, who had been held liable to a plaintiff in an amount greater than the insurance coverage, to protect itself pending appeal by giving an undertaking to perfect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Mandon Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Murphy v. Mandon Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. CTI Container Transport International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Kreitzer v. ChamiklesNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Community Health of South Dade, Inc. v. HaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API