Legal Opinion · Dissent

Piedmont Hospital, Inc. v. Palladino

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 2003No. S02G1036Published

1DissentCaeley, Justice

If, as a matter of law, Piedmont Hospital cannot be vicariously liable for Patterson’s assault, then no employer can ever be liable for any sexual misconduct of an employee, no matter how closely connected such conduct may be with the employee’s duties. Thus, the majority effectively establishes an absolute rule that the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to cases involving sexual assault. Today’s ruling contradicts well-settled precedent which applies the doctrine to willful torts committed during momentary, slight deviations from the employment for personal reasons such as anger…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. International Business MacHines, Inc. v. BozardtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Alpharetta First United Methodist Church v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Chorey, Taylor & Feil, P.C. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API