Legal Opinion

Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 1989No. 19, September Term, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

314 Md. 521 (1989)

552 A.2d 29

CHERYL JOHNSON

v.

G.D. SEARLE & COMPANY ET AL. EILEEN M. FERCH

v.

G.D. SEARLE & COMPANY ET AL.

No. 19, September Term, 1988.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 18, 1989.

H. Robert Erwin, Jr. (Pretl & Erwin, P.A., both on brief), Baltimore, for appellants.

James L. Shea (Jill E. Rappaport, Terri L. Turner, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, all on brief), Baltimore, for appellees.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, ADKINS and BLACKWELL, JJ.

RODOWSKY, Judge.

These appeals involve Md.Code (1974, 1984 Repl. Vol.), § 6-104(a) of the Courts and Judicial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API