Legal Opinion

Cupo v. Babcock Borsig Power, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Raymond E. Cornelius, J.

The issue presented, in the above-captioned asbestos related, personal injury and wrongful death actions, is whether the court should grant approval to the settlement of a wrongful death claim, pursuant to EPTL 5-4.6, if there has been no appointment of a personal representative.

The Seventh Judicial District, like many judicial districts throughout the State of New York, has adopted a case management order (CMO) in order to facilitate and expedite asbestos related, personal injury actions. Among other provisions, the CMO directs that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Pollicina v. Misericordia Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Goldberg v. Camp Mikan-RecroNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Schraven v. Town of TonawandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter-Sapp v. HupkowitzDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025
  2. Matter of Seventh Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig.New York Supreme Court, Monroe County · 2004
  3. Morgan v. Oshkosh CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API