Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Public Service Commission

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1961No. 19,239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION A

Pfaff, C. J.

Appellants have brought here for judicial review a decision of the Public Service Commission dated August 1, 1958, relating to the matter of rates, tolls, charges, rules and regulations applicable to intrastate message toll telephone service in the State of Indiana pursuant to Acts of 1957, ch. 189, §54-443, Bums’ 1951 Replacement (Supp.). The proceeding before the Commission was numbered as Ex Parte No. 27660.

It appears from the record that one company, not a party to this review, hereinafter referred to as Indiana Bell, owns and operates the basic telephone network in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monon Railroad v. Citizens of Sherwood ForestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Hamilton Southeastern Utilities, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Home Builder's Ass'n of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Town of Merrillville v. Lincoln Gardens Utilities Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Kragulac v. MarichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API