Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 28, 1986No. 1 Div. 576PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIGH M. CLARK, Retired Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence on a jury trial on an indictment that charged in pertinent part that “on, to-wit: December 31, 1977, Richard Clark did unlawfully possess marihuana, one of the controlled substances set out in the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act.” The court sentenced him to imprisonment for fifteen years.

The “STATEMENT OF THE CASE” contained in brief of counsel for appellant is accepted in the brief of counsel for appellee as “substantially correct.” We now quote the first two paragraphs of said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Fikes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DobyneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API