Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1978No. 38847Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMillian, Judge.

Appellant Tyrone Martin appeals from a final order entered by the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying appellant’s pro se motion to vacate and set aside judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. For reversal appellant argues that the trial court erred in failing to immediately appoint counsel to assist appellant in amending the motion. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court but urge the Supreme Court, to reconsider the present construction of Rule 27.26(h), V.A.M.R.

On June 6, 1973, appellant entered a guilty plea to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Loflin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Voegtlin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Arnold v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API