Legal Opinion

McCasland v. Kimberlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1885No. 11,951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellant brought this action for an alleged malicious prosecution. Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the appellee. A motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the court erred in charging the jury, was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error.

The evidence is in the record, and we conclude from an examination of it that the verdict is fully supported by it. "We can not, therefore, disturb the judgment upon such ground.

No substantial objection is urged to the sixth, seventh and eighth instructions. These define probable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hays v. BlizzardIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Richter v. KosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lacy v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Smith v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stivers v. Old National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Boyd v. HodsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API