Legal Opinion
Bretton Ridge Homeowners Club v. Deangelis
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1985No. 48466PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn McManamon, J.
The Bretton Ridge Homeowners Club (“the Club”) initiated a declaratory judgment action in the Rocky River Municipal Court, naming certain of its members as parties-defendants. The Club now timely appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant-appellees (“the dissenters”), who are owners of parcel numbers 1,2, 3, 4 and 4-A of the Bretton Ridge Subdivision.
Every lot in Bretton Ridge Subdivision is subject to recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions defined in a document entitled “Declaration of Restrictions” which was recorded in the office of the Cuyahoga County Recorder by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Behrle v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Foreman v. Bellefontaine Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Wells v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Talaba v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bretton Ridge Homeowners Club v. DeangelisOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- 75 Public Square v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hoerner v. DownsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hull v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Schregardus v. CroucherOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.