Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cover v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 17, 1942No. 74, 75Published

1ConcurrenceClark, Circuit Judge

I concur in the order amending the opinion. Certainly my brethren should be allowed to draw such sustenance as they can for their admittedly technical ruling3 from the plaintiff’s persistence in sticking by the legal theory of the case which he developed after the record was made up in preference to returning to the at least equally available theory upon which the case was tried below. Possibly a change in strategy might have been the shrewder approach; at any rate, we are now spared the pain of deciding whether a petition for rehearing can restore to us that jurisdiction of which a party’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Richard Irvin & Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Franklin v. Masonite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Hazeltine Corp. v. Emerson Television-Radio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. K. Kaufmann & Co. v. LeitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API