Legal Opinion

Antonellis v. Weinstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 21, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The plaintiffs, Antonellis and Shaneck, each in a separate action, recovered a judgment against the defendant Eva Weinstein, and before February 6, 1926, levied executions, issued in said actions upon a parcel of land *324belonging to the defendant Weinstein. The land was subject to a first mortgage of $4,000, and a second mortgage of $4,100; a third mortgage, dated April 11, 1925, was held by the defendant Shapiro. On December 30, 1925, Shapiro assigned his mortgage to the defendant Kelly; it is agreed that the assignment was without consideration, and that in taking and foreclosing the mortgage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiggin v. HeywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Donohue v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Torrey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Feuer v. CapilowichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. LaCentra v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Barry v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Goldman v. DamonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. O'BRIEN v. SlefkinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
  5. Spaulding v. Quincy Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API