Legal Opinion

Byrane v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OW EAMSEY COUNTY.

1Opinion of the Court

By• the Oourt.

FlaNdeau, J.

This action is brought to recover possession of certain demised premises, upon the ground that the lease is forfeited for non-payment of rent, and certain tases and assessments. The case was not argued in Oourt, nor has either party furnished its with points or authorities to aid our investigations. "We" are informed by the decision of the Oourt below, that the case was decided there upon whether a demand for the rent was necessary under the lease, to entitle the lessor to take advantage of the forfeiture occasioned by non-payment, the Oourt holding that such demand…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. BeachamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Metropolitan Land Co. v. ManningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Shanfelter v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. W. J. Howey Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API