Legal Opinion

Schifano v. Golden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered May 6, 1998, granting defendant Helen Golden’s motion and defendants Louis Pristero and “Jane” Pristero’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds that plaintiff Leah Schifano failed to meet the serious injury threshold of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion and cross motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

In our view, plaintiff presented sufficient objective evidence to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Verderosa v. SimonelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Braham v. U-Haul Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Vargas v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manrique v. Warshaw Woolen Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API