Legal Opinion
RAB PERFORMANCE RECOV. v. George
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 15, 2011No. A-2849-09T1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 A.3d 406 (2011)
419 N.J. Super. 81
RAB PERFORMANCE RECOVERIES, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Aminata GEORGE, Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-2849-09T1.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted February 28, 2011.
Decided March 15, 2011.
Eichenbaum & Stylianou, L.L.C., attorneys for appellant (John Brigandi, Paramus, on the brief).
Aminata George, respondent pro se.
Before Judges LISA, REISNER and SABATINO.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
REISNER, J.A.D.
This case arises under the Door-to-Door Retail Installment Sales Act of 1968 (DDRISA), N.J.S.A. 17:16C-61.1 to -61.9. We hold…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Cesare v. CesareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- UNITED CONS. FIN. SER. v. CarboNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CHANCELLOR ARMS TWO REALTY GROUP, LLC VS. OMAR CLYBURN (LT-038324-17, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- MARIGOLD MANAGEMENT, INC., ETC. VS. RAMALINGAM ARUMUGAM (L-0724-16 AND L-6512-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- MARIGOLD MANAGEMENT, INC., ETC. VS. RAMALINGAM ARUMUGAM (L-0724-16 AND L-6512-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- TROOPER BRETT BLOOM, ETC. VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (L-542-12, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017