Legal Opinion

George L. Reynolds v. Jack C. Ellingsworth, Warden and Charles M. Oberly, III

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 24, 1988No. 86-5633Published

1Opinion

SUR DENIAL OF REHEARING

2Per curiam

In their petition for rehearing, appellees raise three points that merit discussion. First, they argue that Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 511 acts as a procedural bar to claims raised for the first time in a proceeding brought pursuant to Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 35, where counsel had made a tactical choice not to object at trial or to present the issue on appeal. We cannot read this specific requirement into the general language of Conyers v. State, 422 A.2d 345 (Del.1980) (per curiam). Conyers does not refer to, or rely upon, Rule 51. The other…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Murrell Toby Hockenbury, III v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. New Castle County v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. James Gardner v. Joseph PonteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API