Van Siclen v. Herbst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from trial term, Kings county. Action by Albert W. Van Siclen against Louis Herbst. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
This action is brought to recover commissions as broker on a sale of a piece of real estate owned by the defendant. The case involves a mere question of fact. It is conceded that in 1890 the defendant employed the plaintiff to sell the property for $10,000. It is also conceded that the employment continued'until about the month of April, 1892. The defendant testified that at this time, both orally and by letter, he terminated the plaintiff’s employment. This the plaintiff denied. In July or August of 1892, the plaintiff procured a purchaser who was willing to buy the property for $10,000. The…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. BentsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920