Legal Opinion

USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1998No. CIV.A. 95-866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking indemnification under approximately 278 umbrella and excess policies of insurance for financial losses in excess of $590,218,-296.92 which plaintiffs incurred as a result of judgments and civil suit settlements following a criminal conviction and the entry of civil judgments against plaintiff Bessem er & Lake Erie Railroad Company (“B & LE”) arising out of its participation in a twenty year conspiracy to violate federal and state antitrust laws. Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to amend complaint to add…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Usx Corporation v. Adriatic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. OneBeacon America Insurance v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. USX Corp. v. Adriatic InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. EQUITAS HOLDINGSDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Employers Insurance v. Equitas Holdings Ltd.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API