Legal Opinion

Orval Meeks v. Jewel Companies, Inc., a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 1988No. 87-2719PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The merits of this appeal, which is from the grant of summary judgment to the defendant in a Title VII employment discrimination suit, involve no issue of general significance; they are discussed in an unpublished order, issued today, affirming the district court’s judgment. This opinion is limited to the defendant’s request for attorney’s fees under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a rule that empowers us to impose sanctions for frivolous appeals.

The plaintiff’s appeal, although not meritorious, is plainly not frivolous; it is the defendant’s request for Rule 38 sanctions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Central Ice Cream Company, Debtor. Appeals of Joan G. Rafel and George S. Kamberos, Bernard C. Chaitman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Aircraft Trading & Services, Inc. v. Braniff, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sk Hand Tool Corporation and Corcoran Partners, Ltd. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Laurie Connolly D/B/A Brindar Designs v. J.T. Ventures and John LangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Hunt v. DaVita, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Earle A. Partington v. Joseph M. Gedan Howard T. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Charles W. Leigh & Ervin F. Dusek, and Estate of George Johnson, Intervening Cross-Appellees v. Clyde William Engle, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API