Legal Opinion
Quick Communications, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 2008No. 06-2103PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
The Michigan Public Services Commission ordered Quick Communications Incorporated and Michigan Bell Telephone Company (d/b/a AT & T) to amend their interconnection agreement to conform with the Commission’s most recently approved service rates. Quick brought suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the terms of the interconnection agreement, the Sierra-Mobile doctrine, and the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution prohibited the Commission’s action. The district court granted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- John J. Mascio v. Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio Richard E. SchumacherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Shemelia Burdett-Foster v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Covad Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. v. KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- North County Communications Co v. Qwest CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.