Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Walker. Tried below before the Hon. J. R. Burnett. There is no occasion for a statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

If we were left to our understanding of what is defined to be adultery in holy writ, we should probably hold the indictment in this case to be good, and the prosecution to be made out under it.

But when we refer to our statutes, we confess our inability to understand what is really meant by Sections 2022, ’3, ’4, ’5, ’6, Paschal’s Digest. Section 2022 says,'' every man and woman who shall live together in adultery, or fornication, shall be' punished by fine not less than one hundred dollars, nor more than one thousand dollars^ In The State v. Foster, 31 Texas, 518, this court decided that the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878
  3. Sweeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API