Legal Opinion

Padova v. Eckhardt

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

George A. Murphy, J.

The defendants, Richard Eckhardt, as the executor of the estate of the decedent, Eric P. Newton, and Charles Randel, as the sole beneficiary of the estate have moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

In this action, commenced pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiff, Fay Padova, as the administratrix of the estate of decedent, Daniel Savarese, seeks to recover a one-half interest in real property located at 62 Firwood Road in Port Washington.

On or about July 16, 1953, Daniel Savarese…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Purdy v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Ford v. . ClendeninNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Miner v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Beers v. HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pravato v. M.E.F. Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kolb v. AnisisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Monti v. ChassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Article Ten Properties, Ltd. v. KocakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API