Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Dooley

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 21, 2021No. 4:21-cv-04085Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL JOSE GOMEZ, 4:21-CV-04085-RAL Petitioner, oo OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Vs. RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT DOOLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL ' OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, □ Respondents. Petitioner Daniel Jose Gomez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. Respondents’ move to dismiss and Gomez moves to appoint counsel and to electronically file. Docs. 6, 8, 12. I. Judicial Notice First, Respondents ask this Court to take judicial notice of the judicial rulings in Gomez’s state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Christi Thompson v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Kent v. United Of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Michael R. Hogan v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API