Legal Opinion

Sias v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 1985No. Nos. 84-967, 84-968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASKIN, Judge.

We reject as without merit appellant’s challenges to the validity of his convictions for kidnapping without a firearm, robbery without a firearm, and sexual battery without a firearm. See Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.1984); Justus v. State, 438 So.2d 358 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1332, 79 L.Ed.2d 726 (1984); Crum v. State, 172 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 218 (Fla.1965).

We vacate the sentences, however, and remand for resentencing. The trial court and the state erroneously concluded that appellant had been convicted of “life…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Crum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. In re Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Justus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crowder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. McLeod v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API