Wroton v. Wash-Bowl, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
When this case was first before us we remanded for a new trial solely on the issue of damages without consideration of loss of profits as an element. Wash-Bowl, Inc. v. Wroton, 432 So.2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Thereafter, the trial court entered judgment for damages, ruling that the Wrotons were precluded from seeking damages for moving expenses and for their loss on the discount of a note. His ruling was predicated on the fact that because the trial judge in the first trial had ruled that *968these items were not proper elements of damage and the Wrotons had not cross-appealed from that ruling,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Howell v. HowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Alford v. SummerlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. StabileDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Wash-Bowl, Inc. v. WrotonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Behar v. JEFFERSON NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. ArduengoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- PRN of Denver, Inc. v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988