Legal Opinion

Durham v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 12, 1997No. 77,514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

Claimant suffered a repetitive use type injury to his shoulder while working for Cessna. The parties agree that the date of the alleged accident was October 27, 1992, and each and every working day thereafter. Claimant instituted this workers compensation action, and the administrative law judge (ALJ) awarded him a 30% impairment of the body as a whole. The Workers Compensation Board (Board) modified the award of the ALJ to a 29.67% impairment to the left upper extremity only. It also found the date of the accident to have been the last day claimant worked prior to surgery, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Berry v. Boeing Military AirplanesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  4. Condon v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Treaster v. Dillon Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Kimbrough v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Pate v. Riverbend Mobile Home Village, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. Fletcher v. U.S.D. No. 229Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API