Legal Opinion

Trosper v. Wilkerson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1988No. 87CA0335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

In this suit to recover on promissory notes, defendants, D.B. Wilkerson, Jr., Thoroughbred Car Company, Thoroughbred Datsun Car Company, and Wilkerson Motor Company, Inc. (Wilkerson), appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, C.S. Trosper, on his complaint, and entered against them on their counterclaim. We affirm.

In 1980, Trosper sold all outstanding shares of stock in Thoroughbred Datsun Car Company to Wilkerson. The purchase was financed in part by various promissory notes, executed or guaranteed by defendants. The purchase agreement provided that Trosper…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Buckley Bros. Motors, Inc. v. Gran Prix Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Schuster v. ZwickerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Certified Indemnity Company v. ThunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fleet v. ZwickColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Omnibank Parker Road, N.A. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. May Department Stores Co. v. University Hills, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Hunter v. Colorado Mountain Junior College DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Johnson Realty v. BenderColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API