Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 15, 1834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ON ERROR from St. Louis Circuit Court;.

1Opinion of the CourtWash, J.

The plaintiffs in error brought suit against the defendant in error, before a Justicof /the Peace, and had judgment by default, frcm-whicK the defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, where the judgment by default was set aside or reversed, and the plaintiffs in error now prosecute their writ of error in this Court to reverse the judgment of that Court. The original summons served oír the defendant required Mm to appear and answer Thomas Barnett &-Ivers, &c.; the defendant appeared, and after several continuances, not appearing on the day set for trial, a judgment by default was rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Breedlove & Robeson v. Nicolet & SiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garnet v. RodgersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Julian v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Downing v. LashotMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Borgwald v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API