Legal Opinion

Hagedorn v. Schrum

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1939No. 44494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

There is no dispute as to the facts in this case. They all appear in the plaintiff’s petition.

Plaintiff alleged that he is a resident and citizen of the town of Manning, Iowa; that Nick Schrum at the times hereinafter referred to was a marshal and peace officer of the said town; that Manning is one of the duly organized and existing municipal corporations of the State of Iowa, located in Carroll county; in conducting and carrying on the town’s business it has duly elected officers • that it purchased and delivered to Nick Schrum, its marshal, a tear gas gun for the purpose of aiding the said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ogg v. City of LansingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Calwell v. City of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. President of Odell v. SchroederIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Rowley v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. City of SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Strong Ex Rel. Strong v. Town of LansingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Lacy v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Lacy v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API