Legal Opinion

McErlain, Tr. v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1934No. 25,809PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

John C. Rummel & Son made an assignment to E. J. McErlain, as trustee for the benefit of their creditors. Appellee was an employee and creditor for his services as a “manual and mechanical laborer.” He filed a claim under §3 of the Acts of 1885, p. 36, §9342, Burns 1926, §40-110, Burns 1933, which provides for a preference against other creditors in favor of “manual or mechanical laborers” for the full amount due. Other employees of the assignors filed claims, claiming a preference in their favor as employees to the extent of $50.00, under the Act of 1879, p. 153, as amended by the Acts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heckler v. ConterIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. County Department of Public Welfare v. PotthoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. FORKS v. City of WarsawIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Scott v. SCOTT, ADMRX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API