Legal Opinion
Ernst v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 1985No. 1-784A166PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Clifford B. Ernst, Jr. (Ernst) appeals the Floyd Cireuit Court's granting of appellees' Motion for Summary Judgment. Ernst sued Indiana Bell Telephone Company (Bell) and L. Keith Wable (Wable) and Jack Mattix (Mattix), individuals and as agents of Bell, alleging that appellees defamed him, resulting in injury to his reputation and the loss of his job with the company.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
Ernst was employed as an installer/repairman by Bell, working out of New Albany, Indiana. He was a member of the Communication Workers of America (CWA), a union…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. EdgmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lawson v. Howmet Aluminum Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shallenberger v. Scoggins-Tomlinson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brockman v. Detroit Diesel Allison Division of General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Shuee v. GedertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Baker v. Lafayette CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Chambers v. American Trans Air, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Baker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.