Legal Opinion

State v. Motzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2010PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered October 19, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. The order, inter alia, determined that respondent is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order determining that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.11 (d) and committing him to a secure treatment facility. Respondent previously…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hambsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. Timothy JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Hinlicky v. DreyfussNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. Donald N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Greene v. RobargeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. State v. Mark S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. State v. Timothy EE.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. State v. BoutelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Skinner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API