Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Incorporated Village of Piermont
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*810In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), entered August 31, 2006, and (2) a resettled judgment of the same court entered September 7, 2006, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 11, 2006, inter alia, granting the separate motions of the defendants Incorporated Village of Piermont and Town of Orangetown for summaiy judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, is in favor of those defendants and against them dismissing the complaint insofar as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Urquhart v. . City of OgdensburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- De Witt Properties, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Tappan Wire & Cable, Inc. v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Holy Temple First Church of God in Christ v. City of HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Insurance v. City of JamestownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Brandenburg v. County of Rockland Sewer Dist. 1, State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Bilotta v. Town of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bilotta v. Town of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013