Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mallett v. Shannon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

In 1924, the relator, Norma Shannon, obtained a decree of divorce from George W. Shannon, the defendant in these contempt proceedings, and was awarded the custody of their minor son who was then about five years of age. There was no provision in the decree requiring the defendant to pay either alimony or for the support of the child.

In 1926, both of said parties remarried and some four years later relator’s second husband died. Thereafter, and in June, 1931, she applied to the court for an order requiring the defendant in these proceedings to contribute to the' support of their minor child…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Follett v. La FollettOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Newhouse v. NewhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State Ex Rel. Hall v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Nichol v. NicholOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. BlackwellOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Matheny v. MathenyOregon Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API