Legal Opinion

Franzen v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1937No. Appeals, 103 and 104PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

In this case a compulsory nonsuit was entered by the trial court because there was not sufficient evidence to warrant submitting it to the jury. After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we are convinced that the trial judge made no mistake.

The suit is by a father for himself and a minor son, twenty years of age, for damage and loss sustained as the result of alleged negligence on the part of defendant. The accident happened in this way. The minor plaintiff was assisting a friend to start his automobile. They had pushed the machine from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gant v. . GantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Sylvester v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Wiser v. Parkway Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. White v. RoydhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brusis v. HenkelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Rockey v. ErnestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Helm v. South Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. De Francisco v. La FaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API