Legal Opinion

Sack v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1934No. Appeal 234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

-Tbexleb, P. J.,

This is an action of assumpsit upon an industrial policy of life insurance brought by the administrator of the estate of the insured. The trial judge directed the jury to find for the defendant, but the court en banc subsequently set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial.

The policy contained the following: “This policy constitutes the entire agreement between the company and the insured and the holder and owner hereof. Its terms cannot be- changed, or its conditions varied, except by the express agreement of -the company evidenced by the signature of its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Connell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Panopoulos v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Brelish v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Taylor v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Smolinsky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. JacobsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API