Legal Opinion

Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 20, 1940No. 7187Published

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

■ Plaintiff makes the following contentions: The tax on its distilled spirits does not attach until they are withdrawn. The loss of the spirits in question did not constitute such a withdrawal or removal as to warrant the assessment of a tax. In other words, losses occurring during operation and production in the distillery are to be distinguished from losses in warehouse after the spirits have been withdrawn from the’ cisterns, and entered the storage rooms or warehouse. A loss of spirits occurring during production in a distillery due to negligence does not justify or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. WittenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. GuestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  4. United States v. SiskCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API