Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1987No. 2 CA-CR 87-0477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Judge.

Appellant Charles Anthony McDonald appeals from convictions for armed burglary, armed robbery, and kidnapping. McDonald argues that the prosecutor engaged in impermissible argument, the trial court improperly considered the truthfulness of McDonald’s testimony in deciding the appropriate sentence, and the trial court improperly increased- McDonald’s sentence from that received after his first trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On May 1, 1984, at approximately 3:00 a.m., Nigel Yorwith was leaving a Goog’s Restaurant in Phoenix when he was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oscar Poteet v. William Fauver, Warden, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. HolderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. McCutcheonArizona Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State v. DagenaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API