State v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Judge.
Appellant Charles Anthony McDonald appeals from convictions for armed burglary, armed robbery, and kidnapping. McDonald argues that the prosecutor engaged in impermissible argument, the trial court improperly considered the truthfulness of McDonald’s testimony in deciding the appropriate sentence, and the trial court improperly increased- McDonald’s sentence from that received after his first trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On May 1, 1984, at approximately 3:00 a.m., Nigel Yorwith was leaving a Goog’s Restaurant in Phoenix when he was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oscar Poteet v. William Fauver, Warden, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- State v. HolderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. McCutcheonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. DagenaisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990