Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Karp Metal Products, Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 1943No. 175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board’s order, sought to be enforced in this case, was based on findings that on June 3, 1941, a C. I. O. local was the representative of a majority of the respondent’s employees, and that the respondent had evaded its duty in refusing to bargain collectively with it; and further, that it had “demonstrated its favoritism” toward a union of its own employees, which it dominated and with which it bargained collectively. Upon these findings it ordered the respondent to cease from dominating the employees’ union and from continuing to recognize it, and it affirmatively ordered the respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Buka Coal Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. National Labor Relations Board. v. James Thompson & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Franks Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. A. Sartorius & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API