Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Haase

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 11, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The testatrix gave the residue of her estate to her four children in equal shares, stipulating, however, “ that from the share which my son, Frederick Haase, would be entitled to receive upon my death, that there be deducted from such share the amount of his indebtedness to me, plus accumulated interest, which indebtedness is evidenced by a certain note executed to me by my son, Frederick Haase, and bearing date the 1st day of July 1929.”

*43The decedent died on June 3, 1939. Since more than six years had expired since the giving of the note, it would obviously have been unenforcible…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Wolfson v. Syracuse Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Kimball v. ScribnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Pratt v. HugginsNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Devoe v. LutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Will of HartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  2. In re the Accounting of BarnesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  3. In re the Accounting of FeltesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  4. In re the Estate of MuldoonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of RileyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API