People v. Green
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s opening statement failed to describe counts 35 through 37 of the indictment is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). The remaining challenged portions of the prosecutor’s opening statement *954“adequately described what the People intended to prove, and properly prepared the jury to resolve the factual issues at the trial” (People v Larios, 25 AD3d 569, 570 [2006]; see CPL 260.30 [3]; People v Kurtz, 51 NY2d 380, 384 [1980], cert denied 451 US 911 [1981]).
The County Court providently…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. ReardonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WilkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Saenz DeViteri v. SaldanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.