Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Mihm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. Nos. 91-1346, 91-1593 and 91-1670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The central issue in this case is whether there is some evidence to support the commission’s orders awarding compensation for impaired earning capacity. For the reasons that follow, we find that the commission’s orders are supported by some evidence and are in accordance with law.

The commission’s orders pertaining to the allowance of benefits for impaired earning capacity referred to the medical reports of a “Dr. Steiman.” However, no such reports are contained in the record. Rather, the only medical reports which appear in the record are those of Drs. Kackley, McCloud and Hubbell. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Ross v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-560 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API