Legal Opinion

People v. Foley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1954PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the convictions of the defendants of the crimes of burglary, third degree, and larceny, second degree, are predicated upon their alleged recent, conscious and exclusive possession of the fruits of those crimes. (Knickerbocker v. People, 43 N. Y. 177, 179-180.) The Appellate Division has unanimously reversed the convictions on the law and has ordered a new trial for the reason that such alleged possession was not established by direct evidence but was based upon circumstantial evidence alone. That, the Appellate Division has held, makes the prosecution’s case subject to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. People v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People v. WolteringNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. People v. MayNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. KirnonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. People v. ShurnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People v. CefaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Spiegel v. Saks 34th StreetAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API