Legal Opinion

Dockery v. Gardner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff filed, in the circuit court of Multnomah county, his complaint in which he alleged that plaintiff, at the request of defendant, performed work, labor and services for defendant and incurred expenses in connection therewith, of the agreed and reasonable value of $5,065.79; that on November —, 1928, an account was stated between plaintiff and defendant and there was found due plaintiff from defendant, after deducting all credits, $2,465.79, none of which had been paid except $1,000; that there is due and owing the sum of $1,465.79, for which he prays judgment.

Defendant, in his answer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Farmers' National Bank v. WoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Harmon v. DeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Raski v. WiseOregon Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hornby v. WiperOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. JamiesonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Freightliner Corporation v. GylesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Newman v. Utility Trailer & Equip. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API