Legal Opinion

Lamonica v. Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1967No. 6942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Judge.

Plaintiffs Henry J. Lamonica and his-wife Dorothy Pendarvis Lamonica filed this suit against the Royal Furniture Company of Baton Rouge, Inc. seeking an injunction against a garnishment on the wages-of Mrs. Dorothy. Pendarvis Lamonica on the grounds that the garnishment was illegal and also asking for damages to her reputation, attorneys fees and reimbursement of all wages withheld. Plaintiff Henry J. Lamonica prays for judgment in the amount of $6003.43 and Mrs. Dorothy Pendarvis Lamonica seeks a judgment of $5000.00.

After a trial on a rule for a preliminary injunction the Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D. H. Holmes Co. v. Van RyperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated v. PerryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Montgomery v. GremillionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RDM CORPORATION v. PattersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  2. General Tire Service v. NashLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. R. D. M. Corp. v. PattersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Lamonica v. Royal Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API